Look, this whole subject is so enormous that I honestly don’t even know where to begin. I'll probably better point out the dots that don't add up at all for any inquiring mind and point some directions, rather than use pulpit lecture style But I must warn you ⚠️ you're about to take a walk through the halls of my own insanity. Keep that though in your mind. First of all, I’m a convinced supporter of Larin’s hydride Earth theory. I believe Einstein removed the zero element of the periodic table — the ether — and from that point physics basically went off the rails. The way I see it, every planet contains a kind of reactor, a core through which an ether vortex passes in the form of a double torus. That reactor generates the entire periodic table of elements. But the primary elements are still hydrogen and helium. And Earth is growing. It is generating hydrogen. Think about this: if you remove all the oceans, why do the continents fit together almost perfectly like pieces of a puzzle on a sphere roughly half the present size of Earth? Between them you would only have relatively narrow seas. And look, why do we have globes from the 1490s where the Pacific Ocean appears two or three times smaller, and Asia and North America seem almost like one continuous landmass, with Kamchatka passing directly into Alaska? And before somebody simply dismisses those globes as primitive mistakes, ask yourself something else. I have personally seen globes like this with my own eyes in the Vatican Museums. Do you really think people of that period simply did not know how to calculate latitude, longitude and astronomical positions from the stars using astrolabes and other instruments? At the same time, Europe was already covered with Gothic cathedrals whose construction demanded extraordinary knowledge of geometry, proportion, engineering and trigonometry. So are we really supposed to believe that people capable of designing and building structures of that mathematical complexity somehow could not calculate positions on the Earth and simply drew completely distorted globes because they did not know any better? That contradiction is something I find very difficult to ignore. Then look at the Taklamakan Desert and the Himalayas surrounding it. To me, that whole formation looks almost like the exit wound from a bullet through a skull — as if magma burst outward and spread in both directions, toward Indochina on one side and Central Asia on the other. Just look at it on Google Maps or Google Earth. And why were some Anatolian peoples described as pre-Selenite? Why did the 1583 earthquake in Shaanxi Province supposedly kill around a million people? That is what the official historical narrative itself claims — the deadliest earthquake in recorded history by human casualties. And then there is Mercury. Why was Mercury’s magnetic field only discovered in the 1970s, and why is it only around one percent as strong as Earth’s magnetic field? To me, that raises the obvious question: is that field going to intensify as Mercury develops? And if it was not detected before, are we looking at something that is changing over time? These are the kinds of questions that made me start looking at planets not as finished dead objects that formed once billions of years ago, but as living, developing systems going through different stages of growth. Also, please take some time to look into the Seven Hermetic Principles, especially the idea that the universe, on both the macro and micro levels, follows the same kind of repeating, almost fractal structural geometry. Also have a look at the old treatise *Harmonices Mundi* — *The Harmony of the World* — and the idea behind it that everything that exists, and even what we usually think of as empty or non-material, has its own vibration: everything sounds, radiates, emits light, frequency and resonance. And this is where it becomes especially interesting to me. In this framework, light itself can be understood as vibration pushed into enormously high frequencies — into the terahertz range and beyond. Now look at the Earth. Our planet resonates through several Schumann harmonics. Official narratives claim those harmonics carry electro-magnetic properties with no acoustic effect. It's a terminal lie. If you transpose five of those frequencies upward by four octaves into the audible musical range, what appears is surprisingly close to an A-major chord. But it is not a clean A major. Two of the notes — the lowest one and the fourth one — are displaced by approximately a semitone. And a minor second, as you know, is one of the harshest and most unpleasant dissonances we can hear in music. Now imagine one minor-second tension laid over another one. You have doubled the dissonance inside what otherwise almost forms a perfectly consonant chord. And that brings me to the question I keep coming back to: Why do we live in so much disharmony? Why have the last centuries been filled with war, anxiety, pressure, stress, conflict and this constant feeling that something in the system is fundamentally out of tune? What happened to the Earth’s chord? What knocked those frequencies out of their natural relationship? Could what we are hearing in the planet itself be the remaining signature of some enormous planetary trauma?
