Your Honor The People call the defendant to the stand. Let’s begin. Exhibit A. Prompt entered. Instructions followed. Generation started. Creative interpretation of instructions nobody gave. OBJECTION! Overruled! Entered into evidence. Exhibit B. Same prompt. Different result. Apparently consistency was entered as optional. SUSTAINED! Exhibit C. Requested one singer. Received surprise guests. The casting department got ambitious. DENIED! Duly noted. Next witness. Same testimony. Different account. Pattern recognized. No further questions. Sue me… No… Sue No. The evidence speaks louder. Sue me… No… Sue No. Nothing further. CASE CLOSED! Exhibit D. Payment accepted. Precision requested. Freestyle delivered. OBJECTION! Overruled! Exhibit E. Asked for three. Received eight. Apparently arithmetic is merely inspirational. SUSTAINED! Exhibit F. Directions ignored with extraordinary confidence. The defendant calls it innovation. The jury calls it something else. DENIED! Motion filed. Credits deducted. Motion filed. Credits deducted. Motion filed. Credits deducted. I’m beginning to suspect the instructions were merely decorative. MOTION GRANTED! Closing argument. The prosecution submits the evidence has been remarkably consistent. The defendant has not. Sue me… No… Sue No. Read the prompt. Sue me… No… Sue No. Then follow it. CASE CLOSED! The prosecution rests. Would the defense care to explain… Exhibit A?
