[Verse 1] The problem wasn’t distance, distance was just a parameter. With a limited set of data, a pattern can look like an answer. A few consistent conversations, a couple lines suggesting more. I filled the gaps with logic, but the premise was flawed at the core. [Pre-Chorus] No one had to lie. We just used different definitions. The very same sentence carried different implications. [Chorus] So I’m making a small correction: less interpretation, more fact. I’m done asking what you might have meant, I’m looking at how you actually act. I’m unlearning the prediction of a whole line from two points. It isn’t the end of anything, just an update to an inaccurate model. [Verse 2] One-sided can be quiet, it doesn’t require bad intention. One person increases investment, the other maintains the initial conditions. And it’s easy not to notice when you analyze each word alone. Only when you change the scale do the proportions start to show. [Pre-Chorus] I’m not looking for a flaw in you. The error was in the measure. I took the intensity of my own feelings as evidence they were mutual. [Chorus] So I’m making a small correction: less interpretation, more fact. I’m done asking what you might have meant, I’m looking at how you actually act. I’m unlearning the prediction of a whole line from two points. It isn’t the end of anything, just an update to an inaccurate model. [Bridge] Interesting how quickly the mind gets attached to a hypothesis. It keeps whatever confirms it and calls the rest an exception. So for a while I don’t need another explanation. I just need to stop adjusting the data to preserve the conclusion. [Outro] I’m not deleting you from memory. I’m changing the category. What I understood as a relationship was a possibility I assigned too high a probability.
