Back in the caves, when the hunters drew their fame, every bison, every lion looked exactly flat the same. No shadows, no horizon, here a line and there a line - so I claim the third dimension wasn’t there at that time. Centuries later, pyramids should rose proud and tall, but paintings on the temple walls were still two‑dimensional. No depth, no distant mountains, no perspective to be seen - so who invented the 'recession into depth' within the small pictorial scene? Maybe some genius whispered: *Let’s make things look far away!* Maybe some trickster artist said: *I’ll bend the world today!* But I maintain now: The matrix in which we live could not render the 'time before us' in three dimensions. So I say - with bold conviction - depth was once a contradiction. Painters lived in 2D vision, till the matrix sparked the third dimension. Call it madness, call it fun - but I swear it wasn’t there, not one! .. but I swear it wasn’t there, not one! And if you doubt my theory, take a look at ancient art: no foreground, no background, just a very earnest start. If depth had truly existed, they’d have drawn it, loud and clear - but they didn’t - so I’m right - and that’s my scientific cheer. And while we’re at it - tell me why those cave walls only show bison, lions, mighty stags in every ancient tableau? The entire past is constructed - that’s obvious to see! Seems humans had an ego larger than the cosmic sea - they’d have carved a selfie proudly, even in prehistory. The entire past is constructed - that’s obvious to see! Seems humans had an ego larger than the cosmic sea - they’d have carved a selfie proudly, even in prehistory.
